Skip to main content

The Worst Job Interview Question Ever By HR or Employer

The Worst Job Interview Question Ever By HR or Employer

If you’ve been to a job interview, you been asked it. And if you’ve interviewed someone in a major corporate setting, you’ve probably asked it yourself. Even though it’s answerable, it offers very little insight into a candidate’s ability to complete the task at hand. And yet, it’s become an interview staple in companies and organizations the world over. But it’s time for it to go away. Never again should someone be asked: 

The Worst Job Interview Question Ever By HR or Employer
The Worst Job Interview Question Ever By HR or Employer

Where do you see yourself in 10 years?
When I was 23, freshly moved to a new city right out of college, I sat across from a man in a suit at a Fortune 500 company and heard this question. In my head, I was thinking, “I’ve never thought 10 years into the future – at least not in the concrete way this guy wants me to answer. When I was two, I didn’t think about where I’d be at 12. When I was seven, I didn’t think about what I’d wear to the prom. And even now, I’m less sure than
ever of where I’ll be in a decade.

This is largely due to the fact that up until that point, my life had happened four years at a time. And it’s the same with most people, job-hunting Millennials included. Even though we weren’t as cognitively aware as youngsters, the first four years were spent at home with our parent(s) or in daycare. Then we did a brief stint in kindergarten, followed by grades 1-4 in elementary school. Then it was middle school, which we may or may not have gone to two different places for. After that, we tackled high school, and then spent four (or five) years in college. Thus, for most of us, all of our life’s milestones have happened four years at a time – not 10.

On top of this, we might have moved a lot as one (or both) of our parents climbed the corporate ladder. So, for some of us, we’ve never even lived in the same house for 10 years; no wonder we can’t see ourselves going to work in the same building for that long. And even if we did stay put and even if we attended the same small private school from first grade through graduation, there were still incremental benchmarks, none of which were forecasted 10 years out.

Because of the educational system we grew up in, we were taught how to go from novice to expert in four years. The daunting hallways of 9th grade became friendly confines by senior year. And that gigantic quad our freshman year of college had seemingly shrunk by the time we got our degree. So, we’ve gotten pretty good at learning the ropes and playing the game in the amount of time between Olympics.

Therefore, you need to ask us where we see ourselves in four years. And here’s why:

It’s familiar. We can see things four years out. Sure, things change fast, but even if we transferred schools or fell in and out of love, graduation was always on our mind as an immediately achievable goal.

It’s realistic. Things change quickly. A lot can happen in four years – don’t get us started on 10. We could discover our true passion and calling. We could develop a newfound love for bird watching. We could start a business or a family or become the best badminton player in the state. We need the freedom to take a U-turn, a left turn or to stop. Chances are, we changed our major a few times in college, and that was just in a four-year window. There’s no way we’re going to be the same person in 10.

It’s doable. We can stick with something for four years, if we know we’re working towards something. We’re not going to file meaningless reports for four years, but we will work towards somewhere better than where we started. Remember: we began each four-year cycle not knowing much of anything, but being sure that we’d have a lot figured out soon enough. Allow us than kind of access to knowledge and advancement at the workplace, too.

I don’t remember exactly what my answer was that day. I’m sure I tried to confess my ignorance of the future, while convincing the interviewer that I was right for the job. Nonetheless, when I quit my gig 18 months later, my supervisor told me that I was good at what I did and would be stupid to walk away. He said, “If you just put in 23 more years here, you’ll be sitting pretty and can do whatever you want.” How ludicrous. Why would anyone wait 23 years to do what he or she wants? I had barely even been alive that long.

The first four years out of college can teach anyone just as much (or more) than they learned while in school, if handled well. If you offer a millennial a chance to learn and grow at your company for the next four years, then he or she may then be ready to make that 10-year commitment.

Comments

  1. Some please recommend which service I should pick among the ones listed on this site.IT Jobs Philippines

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Shrinkage & Attrition Calculation: A Comparative Analysis & Formulas in Practice

Shrinkage & Attrition Calculation: A Comparative Analysis & Formulas in Practice Shrinkage & Attrition Calculation: A Comparative Analysis & Formulas in Practice S hrinkage is a term that is broadly defined as the percentage of time that scheduled agents are not available to handle customer interactions. Conceptually, it’s the time that “shrinks” from the schedule. Shrinkage can encompass planned events, such as breaks, paid time off, training, team meetings, coaching sessions, or other activities. It can also include unplanned events such as absenteeism, tardiness or agent attrition. It may also include time lost when agents do not adhere to their planned schedule. This is the percent of time that agents are not where they are scheduled to be or not doing the activity they were scheduled to do. For example, if an agent is supposed to be handling calls but instead is unavailable, they are out of schedule adherence. Shrinkage has two types:

Tongue Twisters

Excellent Tongue Twisters Tongue Twisters A good cook could cook as much cookies as a good cook who could cook Cookies I saw a saw that could out saw any other saw I ever saw. Betty Botter bought some butter, but she said "this butter's bitter! But a bit of better butter will but make my butter better" So she bought some Better butter, better than the bitter butter, and it made her butter better so 'twas better Betty Botter bought a bit of better butter! Black bug bit a big black bear. But where is the big black bear that The big black bug bit? A big bug bit the little beetle but the little beetle bit the big bug Back. If you understand, say "understand" . If you don't understand, say "don't understand". But if you understand and say "don't understand". How do I understand that you understand? Understand! I thought, I thought of thinking of thanking you. RED BULB BLUE BULB RED

What is Training Need Analysis (TNA)? Different Types of Training Need Analysis (TNA)

  Training & Development What is Training? Training is the process of increasing the knowledge and skills of an employee for doing a particular job. It involves the development of skills that are usually necessary to perform a specific job.   What is Development? Development is concerned with the growth of employees in all respects. It is the process by which managers or executives acquire skills and competency in their present jobs and also capabilities for future tasks. TNI or Training Need Analysis What is TNA or Training Need Analysis? It’s the simple identification of the training needs of an individual. Training Need Analysis (TNA) is the study of needs, in the sense prioritization of the needs, according to urgency, organizational requirement etc. Whether the needs identified are pertaining to the job requirements (current or future) or not.     There are three types of training need analysis:   Or